The Downside of Dry Shake Hardeners
Publisher: Kryton International Inc
Access this content
Your content has been opened.
The Downside of Dry Shake Hardeners has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?
Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.
Can't get to your email right now?
To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.
Please enter a valid verification code.
Code sent to:
Register to access this content
By accessing content on the Water & Wastewater News Online Directory you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.
For years, many specifiers have considered dry shake hardeners to be one of the go-to options for help with concrete hardening. After all, it’s been thought that such hardeners will protect concrete from wear and tear. Without that protection, concrete structures would be left vulnerable to abrasive and erosive environments. That can lead to significant damage, leaving grooves in concrete surfaces and otherwise negatively impacting the structural integrity of a building. Due to how critical that damage can be, it’s understandable that many turn to traditionally acceptable solutions like dry shake hardeners. These solutions seemed especially appealing for some time as professionals had fewer options for resolving the issue and relied on what they knew to be industry-standard methods for the time
Similar content you might be interested in
