Advantages of VSA vs PSA Oxygen Generators - Total Cost of Ownership and Power Savings

Publisher: PCI Gases

Access this content

Your content has been opened.

Please verify you are a human before downloading this content.

Advantages of VSA vs PSA Oxygen Generators - Total Cost of Ownership and Power Savings has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?

Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.

Can't get to your email right now?

To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.

Please enter a valid verification code.

Code sent to:

Also, remember to check in your spam, promotions, and other folders.


Register to access this content


By accessing content on the Water & Wastewater News Online Directory you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.

Advantages of VSA vs PSA Oxygen Generators - Total Cost of Ownership and Power Savings

PCI Gases , a California-based manufacturer of oxygen generators used in water and wastewater applications, conducted an energy study on behalf of a Southern California municipality. This study compared life cycle costs of two technologies—Vacuum Swing Adsorption (VSA) and Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA)—used to generate on-site oxygen supply for two separate lift station odor control projects. Each lift station was supplied oxygen by the competing oxygen supply technologies.